Consumer representative experiences of partnership with health workers in Australia
We examine the experiences of Consumer Representatives participating in consumer engagement activities across a public health service in NSW, Australia. A team of Consumer Representatives and staff members use a participatory, constructivist paradigm and a hermeneutic phenomenological approach to analyse ten interviews with Consumer Representatives over three years 2017-2019, and three focus groups in 2020. We explore these experiences and identify the linked contextual factors from their points of view. Consumer Representatives were prepared to invest their time, but they needed respect. “Respect” from a consumer perspective was being meaningfully included, supported and heard, and activities needed to be purposeful and relevant. They operated in a complex environment of people and systems that were sometimes frustrating and hindered partnership. Nevertheless, they were optimistic their involvement made a difference although this may take time. Using hermeneutic phenomenology enabled the results to be seen clearly after a comprehensive and highly iterative process engaging with participants-as-researchers. The results challenge the usual default position of engaging consumers in committees and reveal other opportunities to focus on patient-centered care, as mandated by Australian National Standards for hospital accreditation. Respect is identified as a practice necessary to enhance engagement. Health organisations may improve consumer engagement outcomes as mandated for accreditation by being aware of the experiences of Consumer Representatives giving their time to partner with staff members and health systems. Staff may mitigate Consumer Representative negative experiences by being mindful of the complex people and system environment within health that can impede successful engagement.
Related content
-
Patient Family & Community Engagement
Patients’ Perceptions: A Group Differences Study Twelve Months Before and Twelve Months During a Worldwide Pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic subjected healthcare systems’ to decreasing operational margins, enhanced regulatory scrutiny, and challenges related to patients’ expectations. Until now, there was a lack of empirical evidence studying patients’ perceptions prior to versus deep immersion into the pandemic. This quantitative non-experimental ex post facto causal-comparative study examined if and to what extent there were
Learn more -
Patient Family & Community Engagement
An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Perinatal Experiences in an Acute Setting during Early Phases of the COVID-19 Pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic was highly disruptive for people delivering babies in-hospital and for obstetrical healthcare professionals. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of people with or without COVID-19 giving birth in a community-based hospital to provide patient insight to obstetrical care providers regarding the services/policies used during the pandemic. Nine interviews
Learn more -
Patient Family & Community Engagement
A case study on the impact of an adapted community jury in shaping the Nutrition Standards for hospital menus in New South Wales Australia
Community juries are a form of deliberative democracy and can engage community groups in decision-making about healthcare and service delivery issues and priorities. They can provide insights and value-based perspectives from community groups and are particularly important in resolving perennial and complex system challenges. One such challenge is nutrition in hospitals–where there is a need
Learn more