Covid-19 Vaccine Perception and Hesitancy Among Uninsured Free Clinic Patients
There are many complexities regarding the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines, mainly because the COVID-19 vaccine had a fast track of development compared to vaccines developed in the past years. The purpose of this study is to understand COVID-19 vaccine perception and hesitancy among uninsured free clinic patients using the theory of planned behavior. This study had seven focus groups with 37 total participants, including 19 Spanish speakers. Free clinic adult patients (over the age of 18) participated in four focus groups during Summer of 2021. The average age of the participants was 44.7, and the majority of the participants self-identified as female and Hispanic. Social networks are found to be important factors in reducing vaccine hesitancy. Hesitant patients had concerns related to vaccines’ safety, effectiveness, and side effects. The lack of valid and reliable COVID-19 vaccination information was a challenge among this study’s participants. This exploratory study highlights some of the factors contributing to vaccine behavior among free clinic patients. This study concluded that the influence of family and friends are important motivational factors in vaccine behavior. A future study could focus on the multifaceted influences on vaccine hesitancy among free clinic patients, emphasizing the strong motivational role of family and friends while also addressing concerns about vaccine safety, efficacy, and the dissemination of reliable information.
Related content
-
Patient Family & Community Engagement
PX Chat on PFA/PFACS: Sustaining/Growing
12pm ET / 11am CT / 10am MT / 9am PT – Join The Beryl Institute community for an opportunity to connect with your peers on the support and resources needed to address efforts around sustaining and growing PFAs and PFACs in their organizations. Breakout discussion groups allow you to share your challenges, celebrate your
Learn more -
Patient Family & Community Engagement
Black Voices On Gynecologic Cancer: Understanding Experiences (BVOGUE)
The voices of Black patient advocates are often absent from research studies. By centering these voices, new strategies can be identified to address and positively impact disparities across the clinical care spectrum, from diagnosis to survivorship. The study aims to identify common and unique experiences of racism and bias among Black patients with gynecologic cancer.
Learn more -
Patient Family & Community Engagement
A case study on the impact of an adapted community jury in shaping the Nutrition Standards for hospital menus in New South Wales Australia
Community juries are a form of deliberative democracy and can engage community groups in decision-making about healthcare and service delivery issues and priorities. They can provide insights and value-based perspectives from community groups and are particularly important in resolving perennial and complex system challenges. One such challenge is nutrition in hospitals–where there is a need
Learn more