Engage in the Global Experience Measure Inquiry
In recent years, the Global Experience Measure (GXM) effort at the Institute has brought together over 1,000 member voices from our global community. Driven by feedback from our Global Council and inspired by a PXJ article, Measuring what matters: A proposal for reframing how we evaluate and improve experience in healthcare, this effort has led to the creation of a core set of items that are now being tested worldwide. We aim to identify common questions we can ask healthcare recipients, regardless of country, systemic structure, or cultural lens, to uncover where positive experiences are occurring to elevate proven practices for broader application.
if you are interested in participating or have other questions, please reach out to Brittany Lax at brittany.lax@theberylinstitute.org
Related content
-
Policy & MeasurementLeveraging patient experience measures as surrogate outcomes to evaluate health care interventions
Patient experience quality measure scores are widely accepted as outcomes in health services research. For some patients and in some settings, such as hospice care, they can be the most important outcomes. While these measures are widely used, the potential to use them as surrogate outcomes in a clinical trial sense has gone under-recognized. The
Learn more -
Policy & MeasurementCurrent PROM and PREM use in health system performance measurement: Still a way to go
There is a growing impetus to “measure what matters” to enable health systems to optimise value-based, person-centred healthcare. This paper describes the critical importance of patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs) in this pursuit and provides an in-depth overview of how PROM and PREM programs differ between England, the United States, and Australia.
Learn more -
Policy & MeasurementInterventions that improve patient experience evidenced by raising HCAHPS and CG-CAHPS Scores: A narrative literature review
Hospital administrators and researchers often use large, standardized surveys that examine patient satisfaction to evaluate whether interventions improve patient experience. To summarize the breadth of these interventions and how large, standardized surveys are used to evaluate them, a multidisciplinary research team conducted a review. They used PubMed and Google Scholar searches, reviews of reference lists
Learn more
Ask questions, share insights and connect with other experience leaders.
PX ConnectBecome a member for access to this resource and more:
- Live and On-demand Webinars and Connection Calls
- PX Papers, Case Studies and Research Reports
- PX Connect Online Community
- Discounts on Learning Programs and Events
Become a member for access to this resource and more:
- Live and On-demand Webinars and Connection Calls
- PX Papers, Case Studies and Research Reports
- PX Connect Online Community
- Discounts on Learning Programs and Events