Comparing patient experience survey scores between telehealth and in-person ambulatory pediatric subspecialty visits

To determine the effect of encounter methods on patient experience, we evaluated patient experience survey data comparing scores between telehealth and in-person visits and pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 time periods. Pediatric subspecialty visits were either in-person or via telehealth and received the same 16-question patient experience survey. Top box (5/5) scores were compared between in-person and telehealth visits for pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods as well as between periods for in-person and telehealth visits. In addition, for both time periods and encounter methods, correlation analysis was performed to evaluate best correlation between likelihood to recommend practice and the 15 other survey questions. Comparing the COVID-19 period data, there was a statistically significant difference in the top box likelihood to recommend practice score comparing in-person to telehealth numbers (81.01% vs 87.13%, p = 0.0003). Comparing pre-COVID-19 with COVID-19, this was not true for in-person scores (79.97% vs 81.01%, p = 0.4060) or telehealth scores (82.50% vs 87.13%, p = 0.2084). The question with the highest correlation coefficient to likelihood to recommend practice was how well staff worked together in both time periods and visit methods. We conclude that Likelihood to recommend experience scores were statistically significantly higher for telehealth as compared to in-person pediatric subspecialty ambulatory visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. There were no such differences in likelihood to recommend comparing pre- vs COVID-19 time periods for either in-person or telehealth visits so the change in scoring seems to be related to the mode of care delivery.
Related content
-
Policy & Measurement
Redesigning Your Approach to Patient Grievances to Improve Experience
UMass Memorial Medical Center transformed its grievance process to better respond to patient feedback by redesigning three key areas. Learn how building strong relationships with leadership, taking a proactive approach, and implementing “Standard Work” led to faster, more thorough responses, ultimately improving patient satisfaction and reducing response times.
Learn more -
Policy & Measurement
The Perceived Usefulness of Patient Narrative Feedback in Primary Care Settings
Research suggests that insights from patient narratives – stories about care experiences in patients’ own words – contain information that can be used to improve care. However, assessments of narratives reported by clinical personnel have been mixed.
Learn more -
Policy & Measurement
Association Between Clinicians’ Average Patient Length of Stay and Patient Experience Scores
Objective: Given the current emphasis on patient-centered care, emergency physicians are seeking ways to improve patients’ experience in the emergency department (ED). Length of stay (LOS) in the ED has previously been associated with patient experience ratings, however there is limited literature on this relationship at the clinician level. The objective of this study was
Learn more