Perfect ratings with negative comments: Learning from contradictory patient survey responses

Related content
-
Policy & Measurement
Interventions that improve patient experience evidenced by raising HCAHPS and CG-CAHPS Scores: A narrative literature review
Hospital administrators and researchers often use large, standardized surveys that examine patient satisfaction to evaluate whether interventions improve patient experience. To summarize the breadth of these interventions and how large, standardized surveys are used to evaluate them, a multidisciplinary research team conducted a review. They used PubMed and Google Scholar searches, reviews of reference lists
Learn more -
Culture & Leadership | Policy & Measurement
Impact of Volunteer Programs: What Are We Measuring and Who Are We Telling?
This webinar serves as a companion piece to our most recent PX Paper, “The Evolving Role of Healthcare Volunteer Programs: Elevating the Human Experience through Generosity and Connection.” The paper was guided by the Experience Framework and shared the voices of volunteers and the professionals who lead them about how culture and leadership, reporting relationships
Learn more -
Policy & Measurement
Unlocking Excellence: A Benchmarking Study on Leader Rounding in High-Performing Organizations
Leader rounding on patients has gained recognition as a best practice in healthcare and is linked to improved patient satisfaction outcomes. This study explores the leader rounding frequency and common elements of high-performing hospitals in achieving top-quartile Hospital Overall Ratings. The findings provide a strategic opportunity for organizations to enhance their overall ratings by optimizing
Learn more