Patients’ experiences and satisfaction with health care in the Salah Azaiez Institute of cancer in Tunisia in 2020
Measurement of patient-centered care is a key step to ensure quality of care improvement. The aims of this study were to evaluate the experience of hospitalized patients of Salah Azaiez Institute (SAI) of Cancer of Tunisia in 2020 and to analyze factors associated to the global satisfaction. It was a cross-sectional study. The used questionnaire was derived from the Picker patient questionnaire. Factors associated to the global satisfaction were assessed using Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests. The present study concerned 200 inpatients of the SAI. The Cronbach’s α of the patient experience test (PPE-15) was of 0.82 indicating a good internal consistency. According to results of this study, only 38.5% of the patients were satisfied with their hospitalization. Perception of the quality of the received treatment was good to excellent for 57.0%. Regarding the global organization, 56.5% of the patients found it intermediate and 21.5% perceived it as bad. The highest scores among patient experience dimensions concerned the coordination of healthcare, the respect for patient preference and the physical comfort. However, lowest scores were attributed to the involvement of family and friends, the information and patient education and the emotional support. Unlike socio-demographic factors, patient experience and its dimensions was strongly associated to the global satisfaction. Further studies are recommended to explore patient experience dimensions and other determinants of patient satisfaction in Tunisia.
Related content
-
Policy & Measurement
Co-developing a Paediatric Patient Reported Experience Measure: The Perspectives of Children and Young People
Paediatric Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) are tools that capture what children and young people (CYP) value in their healthcare and promote their involvement in clinical decision-making. A standardised paediatric PREM could improve quality of care for CYP across hospital settings, but CYP are rarely included in the development of PREMs. This study aimed to
Learn more -
Policy & Measurement
Exploring Consumer and Clinician Attitudes towards Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in an Australian Inpatient Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Unit: A Qualitative Pilot Study
This pilot qualitative study explores consumers’ and clinicians’ perspectives about the relevance and utility of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in an Australian inpatient rehabilitation unit. Methods: Two focus groups, were recruited via convenience sampling, comprising English speaking rehabilitation clinicians (n = 5) and consumers (n = 6) who had recent experience of inpatient musculoskeletal rehabilitation
Learn more -
Policy & Measurement
And the Survey Says…: A Qualitative Exploration of the Perspectives of Nurse Managers Who are Accountable for Patient Experience Measures
By examining nurse manager accountability for patient experience measures, this study seeks a deeper understanding of nurse managers’ perceptions of patient experience measures and how these measures drive organizational communication behaviors. Funded through The Beryl Institute’s Grant Program for scholars, Lisa Huddleston, Ph.D., explores whether hospitals use patient experience scores as intended — to guide
Learn more