Measuring cancer care experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia: Trial of a new approach that privileges patient voices
This study examined a new method for measuring the care experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with cancer: the Indigenous People’s Experiences of Cancer Care Survey (IPECCS). The study assessed IPECCS’s: 1) performance; 2) ability to elicit information useful for service improvements; and 3) implementation potential. Three participant groups were recruited from five Australian cancer treatment sites: 1) Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with cancer (+/- support person); 2) interviewers; and 3) health services staff. Trained interviewers administered IPECCS to participants with cancer in audiotaped sessions. Paper forms and transcripts were compared to assess performance, and problems/potential solutions reported by participants with cancer were assessed for actionability. All participant groups completed separate interviews regarding IPECCS. Selected implementation measures were assessed based on interviews and IPECCS administration. Participants (n=31) included 11 Aboriginal people with cancer, 7 support people, 4 interviewers, and 9 health staff. Aboriginal people with cancer spoke at length about their cancer care experiences and identified problems and potential solutions that could be acted upon by health services. Although some parts of the IPECCS form were well-completed, recording was inconsistent and inadequate. Aboriginal people with cancer and interviewers predominantly supported the IPECCS process; while most health staff supported the aims, they questioned its feasibility. Capturing domains of patient experience relevant to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people requires a culturally safe, strengths-based approach. The tension between facilitating meaningful patient engagement and maximizing the efficiency of data collection and use must be resolved to realise the benefits of such an approach.
Related content
-
Policy & Measurement
The Evolving US Patient Experience Measurement and Reporting Landscape: What’s Next for HCAHPS and Why It Matters
The Patient Experience Policy Forum (PXPF) of The Beryl Institute has had a focus on impacting the US patient experience measurement structure since its founding in 2017. PXPF successes over the years have included interfacing with CMS leadership to advocate for updates and improvement of the CAHPS system, including the HCAHPS survey. Significant changes are
Learn more -
Policy & Measurement
Policy & Measurement: The Impact of Patient & Family Involvement
By Rosie Bartel This is the sixth blog in a series of eight by The Beryl Institute’s Global Patient & Family Advisory Board (GPFAB). The intent of this series is to present our perspective on patients’ and families’ lived experience through each of the strategic lenses of The Beryl Institute’s Experience Framework. The Experience Framework
Learn more -
Policy & Measurement | Quality & Clinical Excellence
PX Pulse: Consumer Perspectives on Patient Experience in the U.S. – January 2023
The Beryl Institute and Ipsos released findings from the ninth PX Pulse, a quarterly tracking survey and first of its kind effort to elevate understanding and track current perspectives on patient experience in healthcare across the United States.
Learn more