Measuring cancer care experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia: Trial of a new approach that privileges patient voices
This study examined a new method for measuring the care experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with cancer: the Indigenous People’s Experiences of Cancer Care Survey (IPECCS). The study assessed IPECCS’s: 1) performance; 2) ability to elicit information useful for service improvements; and 3) implementation potential. Three participant groups were recruited from five Australian cancer treatment sites: 1) Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with cancer (+/- support person); 2) interviewers; and 3) health services staff. Trained interviewers administered IPECCS to participants with cancer in audiotaped sessions. Paper forms and transcripts were compared to assess performance, and problems/potential solutions reported by participants with cancer were assessed for actionability. All participant groups completed separate interviews regarding IPECCS. Selected implementation measures were assessed based on interviews and IPECCS administration. Participants (n=31) included 11 Aboriginal people with cancer, 7 support people, 4 interviewers, and 9 health staff. Aboriginal people with cancer spoke at length about their cancer care experiences and identified problems and potential solutions that could be acted upon by health services. Although some parts of the IPECCS form were well-completed, recording was inconsistent and inadequate. Aboriginal people with cancer and interviewers predominantly supported the IPECCS process; while most health staff supported the aims, they questioned its feasibility. Capturing domains of patient experience relevant to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people requires a culturally safe, strengths-based approach. The tension between facilitating meaningful patient engagement and maximizing the efficiency of data collection and use must be resolved to realise the benefits of such an approach.
Related content
-
Infrastructure & Governance | Policy & Measurement
A Global Perspective on Experience Excellence: Examples from Around the World
Join Vita Steina to learn more about her Fellow in Human Experience (FHX) project to explore and gather a collection of leading practices driving experience excellence globally. Vita’s project provided a comprehensive look at how organizations around the world are working to advance their experience work in a variety of critical ways. This collection of
Learn more -
Policy & Measurement | Quality & Clinical Excellence
PX Pulse: Consumer Perspectives on Patient Experience in the U.S. – July 2023
We are pleased to share results from the 13th edition of our PX Pulse survey. Conducted in partnership with Ipsos, PX Pulse captures healthcare consumer perspectives of patient experience in the United States. The latest release of PX Pulse reveals affordability and access to hospitals and treatments continue as important issues to consumers. While the
Learn more -
Policy & Measurement
Current PROM and PREM use in health system performance measurement: Still a way to go
There is a growing impetus to “measure what matters” to enable health systems to optimise value-based, person-centred healthcare. This paper describes the critical importance of patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs) in this pursuit and provides an in-depth overview of how PROM and PREM programs differ between England, the United States, and Australia.
Learn more