Comparing patient experience survey scores between telehealth and in-person ambulatory pediatric subspecialty visits

To determine the effect of encounter methods on patient experience, we evaluated patient experience survey data comparing scores between telehealth and in-person visits and pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 time periods. Pediatric subspecialty visits were either in-person or via telehealth and received the same 16-question patient experience survey. Top box (5/5) scores were compared between in-person and telehealth visits for pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods as well as between periods for in-person and telehealth visits. In addition, for both time periods and encounter methods, correlation analysis was performed to evaluate best correlation between likelihood to recommend practice and the 15 other survey questions. Comparing the COVID-19 period data, there was a statistically significant difference in the top box likelihood to recommend practice score comparing in-person to telehealth numbers (81.01% vs 87.13%, p = 0.0003). Comparing pre-COVID-19 with COVID-19, this was not true for in-person scores (79.97% vs 81.01%, p = 0.4060) or telehealth scores (82.50% vs 87.13%, p = 0.2084). The question with the highest correlation coefficient to likelihood to recommend practice was how well staff worked together in both time periods and visit methods. We conclude that Likelihood to recommend experience scores were statistically significantly higher for telehealth as compared to in-person pediatric subspecialty ambulatory visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. There were no such differences in likelihood to recommend comparing pre- vs COVID-19 time periods for either in-person or telehealth visits so the change in scoring seems to be related to the mode of care delivery.
Related content
-
Culture & Leadership | Policy & Measurement | Staff & Provider Engagement
Effectively Leveraging Patient Comments for Strategic Improvement
During this webinar, Children’s Mercy Kansas City shares results from a year-long case study on the meaningful integration of patient comments and the precise analytics derived from those comments into the strategic improvement planning efforts of an emergency department. The presentation will highlight how this process can foster a culture of human-centered patient and family
Learn more -
Culture & Leadership | Policy & Measurement
The Treatment Impact: Cultural Inclusivity in a Modern World
Caring for patients and their families during tumultuous times can be daunting. Many times, we rely on our past experiences, good or bad, to help us through difficult or ambiguous situations. While empathy is a key component of good service, how do we show cultural inclusivity? How can we make a big impact and improve
Learn more -
Policy & Measurement
Unlocking Excellence: A Benchmarking Study on Leader Rounding in High-Performing Organizations
Leader rounding on patients has gained recognition as a best practice in healthcare and is linked to improved patient satisfaction outcomes. This study explores the leader rounding frequency and common elements of high-performing hospitals in achieving top-quartile Hospital Overall Ratings. The findings provide a strategic opportunity for organizations to enhance their overall ratings by optimizing
Learn more