An evidence-based tool (PE for PS) for healthcare managers to assess patient engagement for patient safety in healthcare organizations
Published April 29, 2021
In 1999, the Institute of Medicine had already warned that medical errors caused between 44,000 and 98,000 avoidable deaths per year in the United States. A similar situation was subsequently in 2000, documented in Canadian hospitals. According to a Canadian Patient Safety Institute report (2016), incidents in both acute and home care settings resulted in additional costs of $2.75 billion each year. Research suggests that Patient Engagement (PE) for Patient Safety (PS) can help address this issue. However, the use of PE in various strategies to promote PS has yet to be fully integrated across healthcare systems in OECD countries. The aim of this study was to develop a tool for managers to assess PE strategies implemented at a health system level to enhance PS. Developing the tool involved 3 phases: (1) creating a framework; (2) building a first version of the tool; (3) validating the tool by an expert committee of PS and PE managers. The final tool consists of 81 questions, divided into four sections: (1) describing the healthcare organization (n=14); (2) gathering general information on PE strategies (n=15); (3) assessing different PE strategies for PS (n=49); and (4) describing the respondent’s involvement in PS committees (n=3). The tool is currently being used (by healthcare professionals working in Risk Management (RM) or PS, or, by task groups that include patients) in a research study in Canada and France, to assist healthcare managers in monitoring the evolution of PE for PS at a system level.
Related content
-
Policy & Measurement
Exploring Consumer and Clinician Attitudes towards Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in an Australian Inpatient Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Unit: A Qualitative Pilot Study
Published November 13, 2024
This pilot qualitative study explores consumers’ and clinicians’ perspectives about the relevance and utility of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in an Australian inpatient rehabilitation unit. Methods: Two focus groups, were recruited via convenience sampling, comprising English speaking rehabilitation clinicians (n = 5) and consumers (n = 6) who had recent experience of inpatient musculoskeletal rehabilitation
Learn more -
Policy & Measurement
A systematic review of the literature on the validity, reliability, and utility of the NHS Friends and Family Test as a method for gathering feedback on and improving the experiences of patients
Published November 12, 2025
The NHS Friends and Family Test (FFT) is widely used across the National Health Service to collect patient feedback on care experiences. Given its scale and cost, there is strong public and organisational interest in the validity, reliability, and utility of the FFT. This study aimed to systematically review the literature on the validity, reliability,
Learn more -
Policy & Measurement
The Evolving US Patient Experience Measurement and Reporting Landscape: What’s Next for HCAHPS and Why It Matters
Published November 7, 2024
The Patient Experience Policy Forum (PXPF) of The Beryl Institute has had a focus on impacting the US patient experience measurement structure since its founding in 2017. PXPF successes over the years have included interfacing with CMS leadership to advocate for updates and improvement of the CAHPS system, including the HCAHPS survey. Significant changes are
Learn more