Utilizing Lessons Learned from Patient Grievances
Lisa Allen, Ph.D., Chief Patient Experience Officer, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
Nicole Iarrobino, Senior Project Administrator, Patient Relations and Patient & Family Centered Care, The Johns Hopkins Hospital
Historically, patient concerns were relegated to staff to whom no one wanted to listen; after all, these complaints were certainly anecdotal and not representative of the culture of service and high quality care at the hospital!
However, with the growing expectation of patient and family centered care as well as the increased attention and new focus on the financial and reputational impact of patient experience, there is now increased recognition of the benefit of using individual patient concerns and clustering them into real time patterns and trends.
At The Johns Hopkins Hospital, there has been an increasing emphasis on listening to and learning from the Patient Relations team. This has included investing in a sensitive and robust data management system which allows for input of the specific patient concerns in detailed areas (location, provider type, inpatient, outpatient, clinical service, name of provider, resolution type requested, etc.). Other investment has been made in numbers of staff, expertise required of staff, and other resources required.
As a result of this investment, individual anecdotes are transformed into identified problem areas which is shared with departments, service excellence coaches, reports to risk management and other leadership. This information is incorporated in to proactive education.
The Chief Patient Experience Officer is now able to align the real time patient grievance data with initiatives for employee training for improving communication, revamping employee orientation and on-boarding, and reviewing and revamping operational processes, including parking garage logistics to discharge planning.
Related content
-
Patient Family & Community Engagement
Patients’ Perceptions: A Group Differences Study Twelve Months Before and Twelve Months During a Worldwide Pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic subjected healthcare systems’ to decreasing operational margins, enhanced regulatory scrutiny, and challenges related to patients’ expectations. Until now, there was a lack of empirical evidence studying patients’ perceptions prior to versus deep immersion into the pandemic. This quantitative non-experimental ex post facto causal-comparative study examined if and to what extent there were
Learn more -
Patient Family & Community Engagement
Consumers’, Family Members’, and Health Practitioners’ Perspectives on Increasing Activity Engagement of Older Patients Admitted to Geriatric Hospital Units
The aim of this study was to explore the perspective of consumers, family members, and health practitioners on increasing patient activity engagement in a Geriatric Evaluation and Management (GEM) Unit. This study followed a qualitative phenomenology approach. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim with consenting patients (n = 12), family members (n =
Learn more -
Patient Family & Community Engagement
Patient Experience (PX) Giants: Pioneers and the Path Forward
This commentary pays tribute to the foundational figures in patient experience (PX) scholarship, acknowledging the “PX Giants” whose contributions have established and expanded the field’s core principles. Building upon the analysis in Foundational PX, which identified highly cited works, this piece honors individual contributors who have contributed to the scholarly foundation of PX. It highlights
Learn more