Partnership, Collaboration, and Co-Production to Improve Patient Experience Beyond Conducting Surveys – Lessons from the Quebec Model, Canada Authors
Published August 8, 2025
The objectives of this article are to present how, in the province of Quebec (Canada), healthcare and service partnerships have been implemented, to take stock of the current situation and to suggest ways to continue strengthening the model over the coming years, in Quebec and elsewhere in the world. Methods: Three methods were mobilized: (1) a review of the literature and reports published in recent years on implementations of partnerships in Quebec; (2) a survey sent to the persons responsible for partnerships in Quebec’s health and social services establishments; and (3) a working committee comprised of patient experts, partnership practitioners and researchers to develop recommendations to further consolidate The Patient Revolution that the province of Quebec is currently experiencing. Results: This Québec model, which has been under development since 2010, is based on the following principles: recognition of: (1) the experiential knowledge of individuals with health or psychosocial conditions who use the healthcare system; (2) the capacity of patients/service users to act as their own caregiver; (3) participation as full members of clinical or psychosocial teams, to complement the information needed to make informed decisions and achieve personal goals; and (4) the ability of individuals to make decisions for themselves, with the support of professionals and family members. The model has been implemented at various levels within the healthcare and social systems, as well as in education, training, and community health. There are also various levels of engagement, ranging from information provision to co-construction. However, in order to continue strengthening the model and support its consistent application throughout the health and social services network, recommendations have been made concerning the overall structure of partnership. Conclusions: The health care and service partnership model has proven to be highly adaptable for application in a variety of contexts. By recognizing the complementarity of scientific, professional, and experiential knowledge, the partnership model supports a levelling of power among stakeholders, both to address health issues as well as for setting priorities in the health system. It therefore offers a path to improving patient experience and outcomes.
Related content
-
Patient Family & Community Engagement
Leveraging PFACs to Strengthen Emergency Department Care
Published May 28, 2026
This webinar will describe how Mount Sinai’s Department of Emergency Medicine conceived, launched, and sustained a system-wide, Emergency Department–focused Patient and Family Advisory Council (PFAC). We will explore how the PFAC’s work moved beyond the traditional “PX silo” to influence ED operations, quality, research, digital tool development, and medical education. The session will highlight the
Learn more -
Patient Family & Community Engagement
From Drifting to Anchored: How Online Health Communities Can Transform Care for Complex Chronic Illness
Published August 6, 2026
This personal narrative recounts a 25-year diagnostic odyssey with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, defined by medical fragmentation, dismissed symptoms, and profound isolation. It illustrates how Online Health Communities (OHCs) bridged the chasm between lived experience and a clinical system ill-equipped for complex chronic illness. For patients like me, these digital forums provide the peer validation, practical knowledge,
Learn more -
Innovation & Technology | Patient Family & Community Engagement
Transforming Patient Care: Expanding Equitable Language Access with AI Across Every Touchpoint
Published January 15, 2026
Complimentary – Clear communication is essential for equitable care, but for the approximately 25 million Americans with limited English proficiency (LEP), language remains a major barrier to safety and quality in healthcare. Though hospitals have improved clinical translation, most language access programs stop at the exam room door. Non-clinical staff—including reception and food services—often lack the
Learn more