Comparing patient experience survey scores between telehealth and in-person ambulatory pediatric subspecialty visits
To determine the effect of encounter methods on patient experience, we evaluated patient experience survey data comparing scores between telehealth and in-person visits and pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 time periods. Pediatric subspecialty visits were either in-person or via telehealth and received the same 16-question patient experience survey. Top box (5/5) scores were compared between in-person and telehealth visits for pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods as well as between periods for in-person and telehealth visits. In addition, for both time periods and encounter methods, correlation analysis was performed to evaluate best correlation between likelihood to recommend practice and the 15 other survey questions. Comparing the COVID-19 period data, there was a statistically significant difference in the top box likelihood to recommend practice score comparing in-person to telehealth numbers (81.01% vs 87.13%, p = 0.0003). Comparing pre-COVID-19 with COVID-19, this was not true for in-person scores (79.97% vs 81.01%, p = 0.4060) or telehealth scores (82.50% vs 87.13%, p = 0.2084). The question with the highest correlation coefficient to likelihood to recommend practice was how well staff worked together in both time periods and visit methods. We conclude that Likelihood to recommend experience scores were statistically significantly higher for telehealth as compared to in-person pediatric subspecialty ambulatory visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. There were no such differences in likelihood to recommend comparing pre- vs COVID-19 time periods for either in-person or telehealth visits so the change in scoring seems to be related to the mode of care delivery.
Related content
-
Policy & Measurement | Quality & Clinical Excellence
PX Pulse: Consumer Perspectives on Patient Experience in the U.S. – November 2023
The latest release of PX Pulse reveals the items of greatest importance to healthcare consumers remain consistent from the previous quarter, but perspectives on the quality of care and overall experience saw the lowest scores in the last two years. This issue also explores the critical issues of trust, provider relationships and providing feedback to
Learn more -
Policy & Measurement
Using Experience-based Design to Understand the Patient and Caregiver Experience with Delirium
Amy London, Product Innovation Specialist, Virginia Mason Medical Center, shares how using experience-based design was an innovative framework to increase their understating of the experience during and following episodes of hospital acquired delirium. Read associated PXJ article
Learn more -
Policy & Measurement
The initial psychometric evaluation of a new Emergency Department Patient-Reported Experience Measure (ED PREM)
Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are critical to evaluating the person-centeredness, safety, and quality of healthcare services internationally. The aim of this study was to describe the initial psychometric evaluation of a new Emergency Department (ED) PREM. Adult patients presenting to the ED of a tertiary hospital in southeast Queensland, Australia during January 2022 were recruited in-person.
Learn more