Lived Experiences of Cancer Patients Who Chose to Stop Receiving Treatment

The study aimed to understand the lived experience of cancer patients who abandon treatment. Four semi-structured interviews were conducted, and the data was examined using interpretative phenomenological analysis. It resulted in four superordinate themes: (i) ‘Lack of knowledge about cancer’ dealt with patients’ knowledge and perceptions about their cancer. (ii) ‘Hopelessness with oneself and God.’ (iii) ‘Distress caused by numerous cancer-related issues’ captured the challenges faced by cancer patients. The last superordinate theme, (iv) Patient dissatisfaction with physicians and treatment’ dealt with cancer patients’ interaction with and expectations from their oncologists and the medical staff. It was found that these factors played a crucial role in treatment abandonment. The decision to discontinue treatment can be attributed to patient dissatisfaction with the physician and treatment. This dissatisfaction was caused by misinformation about the disease, treatment, and distress. Since the patients were familiar with each other as they went for chemotherapy in the same hospital, the decision to abandon the treatment of one participant may have influenced the other participant. For policymakers, it is critical to understand that a ‘dissatisfied patient’ may abandon treatment at any time during their cancer trajectory, consequently affecting the mortality, morbidity, and economic burden of the country.
Related content
-
Infrastructure & Governance | Patient Family & Community Engagement | Policy & Measurement
Patient Advocacy Community Connection Call: Effective Practices for Complaint and Grievance Recording and Reporting
In the ever-evolving landscape of healthcare, patient relations play a crucial role in ensuring a positive patient experience. Effective complaint and grievance recording and reporting are fundamental components of this process, directly impacting patient satisfaction, trust, and overall care quality. Join the Patient Advocacy Community for an insightful discussion of effective practices for managing patient
Learn more -
Patient Family & Community Engagement
A case study on the impact of an adapted community jury in shaping the Nutrition Standards for hospital menus in New South Wales Australia
Community juries are a form of deliberative democracy and can engage community groups in decision-making about healthcare and service delivery issues and priorities. They can provide insights and value-based perspectives from community groups and are particularly important in resolving perennial and complex system challenges. One such challenge is nutrition in hospitals–where there is a need
Learn more -
Patient Family & Community Engagement
Patient, Family, and Health Professional Perspectives of How Families are Involved in Adult Inpatient Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation
Objective: We aimed to answer the following research question: From the perspectives of patients, family members, and health professionals, how are families involved in the rehabilitation of adult patients with Traumatic Brain Injury at an inpatient Acquired Brain Injury service within an adult rehabilitation centre? Methods: We used an interpretive qualitative approach, from a constructivist view.
Learn more