Living with COVID-19 in the community during the first wave of the pandemic: Lessons from patients for healthcare providers and policy makers
This qualitative descriptive study explores patients’ experiences of living with COVID-19, in the community, during the early stages of the pandemic. Between October 2020 and April 2021, fifteen semi-structured, video-recorded interviews were conducted, via Zoom, with participants in five Canadian provinces. Participants self-identified as having had a confirmed or suspected case of COVID-19. The constant comparative method was used to produce a thematic analysis of findings. Key findings include 1) PCR tests were not widely available in Canada, during the first wave, so many participants lacked a confirmed diagnosis and, subsequently, encountered challenges accessing specialist medical care; 2) Rapidly changing protocols around testing also impacted return to work as employers’ requirements were sometimes misaligned with public health guidelines; 3) Participants often found public health measures to be illogical, inconsistent, or sub-optimally implemented, and frequently perceived them as politically motivated rather than evidence-based; 4) some individuals with persistent symptoms had difficulty gaining acknowledgement and support for what is now more widely acknowledged to be long-COVID; and 5) The view that healthcare providers need a more nuanced approach to patients who lack a confirmed diagnosis or present with hard-to-explain symptoms was widely shared. There is the need for greater responsiveness to the lived experiences of patients with COVID-19, especially those with persistent symptoms, in developing clinical pathways and social supports.
Related content
-
Patient Family & Community Engagement | Policy & Measurement | Staff & Provider Engagement
Signals to Action: Northwestern Medicine’s Journey to Humanizing Healthcare Experiences
In an effort to (re)build trust post-pandemic, many health systems are experiencing the pressure to modernize methods used to engage patients and the workforce who care for them. This trend towards an improvement-focused understanding is reflected in the greater conversations happening across our industry, including the evolved shift in understanding from “Patient” to “Consumer” and
Learn more -
Policy & Measurement
Patient reported experience in a radiation oncology department
Understanding patient experience is essential to providing high quality, person-centered care. A real-time baseline cross-sectional study was completed to identify gaps in patient experience that can be targeted for quality improvement (QI). This study is part of PROSE (Person-centered Radiation Oncology Service Enhancement), a QI initiative developed to improve patient experience at a tertiary cancer
Learn more -
Policy & Measurement | Quality & Clinical Excellence
PX Pulse: Consumer Perspectives on Patient Experience in the U.S. – November 2022
The Beryl Institute and Ipsos released findings from the ninth PX Pulse, a quarterly tracking survey and first of its kind effort to elevate understanding and track current perspectives on patient experience in healthcare across the United States.
Learn more